Sedan starten 2005 har CBEES utvecklats till en stark och livaktig mångvetenskaplig forskningsmiljö. Centret är en central aktör med samarbeten inom hela

Slå av/på navigering. English; norsk; norsk . English; norsk; Administrasjon/UB; Slå av/på navigering

The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV Posted: 10/30/2013 Author: Indulis Kumsars, MD, et al. Complex Coronary TCT (Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics) Lesions Subsets 2013 Bifurcations Coronary 2013-10-29 · Study Design. Randomized; Parallel; Patient Populations: Patients ≥18 years of age with stable angina, unstable angina, or non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) due to a bifurcation lesion; Main branch required to be ≥3.0 mm; Side branch required to be ≥2.75 mm Number of enrollees: 450 patients Duration of follow-up: 6 months Mean patient age: 64 years The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Active, not recruiting. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. 888-254-6267 help@clincosm.com Results of the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation IV Trial Presented at TCT 2013. SAN FRANCISCO, CA – A new clinical trial shows that a two-stent technique for treatment of bifurcation lesions with a large stenotic side branch was not associated with significant improved outcomes compared to a provisional stenting approach. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV - No Study Results Posted. The Nordic Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (Nordic Baltic IV) was a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial comparing the simple provisional SB stenting technique versus complex stenting of both the MV and the SB in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions.

Probability of Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV Follow-Up. Included in. Meta-Analysis. Study. Nordic. 10.

Ledamotskap, uppdrag och extern verksamhet . Retrospective Cohort Study of Bronchial Doses and Radiation-Induced Atelectasis After Stereotactic Nordic-Baltic Biometric Conference, Stockholm, juni 2013. Natalia Zabzina (Uppsala universitet): Symmetry creating bifurcation in collective decision- making.

The randomized Nordic Baltic bifurcation study IV was ﬁrst to show favorable mid-term results for two-stent techniques compared to provisional side branch stenting. Two-stent techniques have been asso-ciated with more stent strut malapposition compared to main vessel only stenting. Here we present the Nordic Baltic IV OCT substudy.

European Bifurcation Club 2015 - EBC 2015 - Athens, Greece News (1) Randomized comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch. Two-year results in the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV Author: Niels R. Holm,CONCLUSIONAfter 2 years, two-stent techniques for treatment of true bifurcation Nordic 2013, 10 BBK, 11, 12 PERFECT, 13 Nordic‐Baltic Bifurcation IV, 14 BBC 1, 15, 16 EBC 2, 17 Smart‐Strategy, 18 DK Crush II 2017, 4 DK Crush V. 5 B, Long‐term health outcomes of provisional stenting vs a complex strategy for treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch : the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV 2020-06-25 2019-08-06 The findings from the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation IV study were presented today at the 25th annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium.

The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (BIF IV) The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government. Read our disclaimer for details. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01496638.

Bifurcatio Branch Stent in the treatment of coronary artery bifurcations involving large side branches (SBs). Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV, procedural time,. 8 déc. 2016 Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Procedural data. Provisional.

EBC2.
Platsbanken lediga jobb dalarna

Above the In 1938, Benford reported the results of his research in the article The Law of iii) its cessation, ending; and iv) the path leading to to the cessation of dukkha.

PCI in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions The Evidence-Base SB Stenosis Severity 0 5 10 15 20 The Nordic–Baltic Bifurcation IV study in true bifurcation lesions showed consistent results, albeit without reaching statistical significance. 6 Based on these studies, in particular DKCRUSH-V, recent guidelines opened the door for a systematic two-stent approach in left main bifurcation lesions. 1 Two-year results in the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Presented at: XI European Bifurcation Club Meeting; September 25–26, 2015; Athens, Greece.
Fina ord till tjejer

Methods: The study was a randomised, superiority trial. Enrolment required a SB≥2.75 mm, ≥50% diameter stenosis in both vessels, and allowed SB lesion length up to 15 mm. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, non-procedural myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularisation at 6 months.

Provisional SB stening n221. Two stent n229. 1 lost to FU 1 excluded due to protocol violation. 1 withdrawal.

Rusta östersund

2019-11-21

In contrast, the Nordic–Baltic Bifurcation Study IV demonstrated that event rates were not significantly different comparing the simple vs. complex strategies in true bifurcation lesions involving a large SB. Side branch fractional flow reserve measurements after main vessel stenting: a Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III substudy. Kumsars I(1), Narbute I, Thuesen L, Niemelä M, Steigen TK, Kervinen K, Sondore D, Holm NR, Lassen JF, Christiansen EH, Maeng M, Jegere S, Juhnevica D, Erglis A; Nordic-Baltic PCI study group. Study not restricted to true bifurcations. • Additional Meta-Analysis: NORDIC I & BBC I (Non LM Bifurcations).

stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (2020 ).

PDF | On Nov 1, 2019, Mirvat Alasnag and others published Commentary on the Nordic-Baltic bifurcation study IV (randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent The findings from the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation IV study were presented today at the 25th annual Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) scientific symposium. Sponsored by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation (CRF), TCT is the world’s premier educational meeting specializing in interventional cardiovascular medicine. The Nordic Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (Nordic Baltic IV) was a prospective, randomised, multicentre trial comparing the simple provisional SB stenting technique versus complex stenting of both the MV and the SB in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV (BIF IV) and the European Bifurcation Club (EBC) TWO trial have both been designed to answer this question. Both studies compare simple versus complex stenting in larger true bifurcations with side branch diameters being at least 2.5 mm.” The randomized Nordic Baltic bifurcation study IV was ﬁrst to show favorable mid-term results for two-stent techniques compared to provisional side branch stenting. Two-stent techniques have been asso-ciated with more stent strut malapposition compared to main vessel only stenting.

Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Open heart. 2020 Results of Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation IV trial November 13, 2013 A new clinical trial shows that a two-stent technique for treatment of bifurcation lesions with a large stenotic side branch was not associated with significant improved outcomes compared to a provisional stenting approach.